Governments Galore
Rousseau has total faith in the
people, he believes that they should govern themselves and they only need a
ruler until they can keep track of themselves. He most likely would approve of
current day democracies because they allow the people to be active in their
government. The ruler of Rousseau’s form of government must be loyal to his
people and act as a father figure, guide the way for his children/ citizens
then let them go once they have all of the necessary skills to fend for
themselves. The citizens living within this land must be willing to give up
their individual rights to a social contract which groups up all of their rights
into one big community right.
Machiavelli 's idea compared to Rousseau seems very harsh, his leader is to be actively involved with governing his people. He believes that whatever the prince decides to do it will always be right and should be honored by the people, even though that choice may not be ethical. This idea can be generated by reading Machiavelli’s the “ends justify the means” quote. The Declaration of Independence does justify the colony’s rebellion because they were not being treated fairly by their ruler. If life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is being denied to the people by the government then they are justified to overthrow their current government.
I believe that independence can
justify war and death, this is because the wellbeing of the people of the
nation should come first. If the people are not being treated fairly then they
should be able to do whatever it takes to be insured independence and freedom. I
think that Jefferson was pleased by the independence that was gained from the
American Revolution, although there was a lot of bloodshed I think he believed
that it needed to be done. I think that he would have agreed with Machiavelli’s
quote because independence did justify the means of war.
No comments:
Post a Comment